VATICAN Metropolis (AP) — The textual content information to the Vatican monsignor offered forgiveness alongside with a menace: “I know everything about you … and I retain it all in my archives,” it browse. “I pardon you, Perlasca, but try to remember, you owe me a favor.”The concept was just one of much more than 100 newly revealed WhatsApp texts and other correspondence entered into proof at the Vatican courthouse final 7 days that have jolted a economic crimes trial involving the Holy See’s income-losing expenditure in a London residence.The texts have solid question on the reliability of a critical suspect-turned-prosecution witness and elevated thoughts about the integrity of the investigation into the London offer and other transactions.With each other with proof that a cardinal secretly recorded Pope Francis, they confirmed that a demo originally aimed at highlighting Francis’ financial reforms has grow to be a Pandora’s Box of unintended revelations about Vatican vendettas and scheming.The trial in the metropolis-state’s felony tribunal originated in the Holy See’s 350 million-euro investment to produce a previous warehouse for department retail outlet Harrods into luxury apartments.Prosecutors have accused 10 individuals in the circumstance, alleging Vatican monsignors and brokers fleeced the Holy See of tens of millions of euros in service fees and commissions, and then extorted the Holy See of 15 million euros to get total manage of the home.Monsignor Alberto Perlasca initially was amongst the primary suspects. As the Vatican official who managed the secretariat of state’s 600 million-euro asset portfolio, he was intimately involved in the house offer.But Perlasca modified his story in August 2020 and begun cooperating with prosecutors, blaming his deputy and his remarkable, Cardinal Angelo Becciu, then the No. 2 in the secretariat of point out, for the London investment and other questionable expenses.Both of those the deputy and Becciu are on demo. Perlasca is not, and his statements to prosecutors grew to become a supply of potential customers that shaped the foundation of several fees in the indictment.Tale continuesWhen Perlasca testified for the prosecution very last 7 days, some of his promises collapsed underneath protection questioning. Decide Giuseppe Pignatone gave Perlasca right until midweek to remember who helped him publish his to start with notify-all memo on Aug. 31, 2020.And then arrived a bombshell, courtesy of the textual content messages that the prosecutor was compelled to introduce into proof after he been given them. They instructed Perlasca wrote the memo implicating his manager right after he experienced obtained threats and tips from a woman who experienced an ax to grind towards Becciu.General public relations professional Francesca Chaouqui beforehand served on a papal fee tasked with investigating the Vatican’s large and murky financials. She is recognized in Vatican circles for her function in the “Vatileaks” scandal of 2015-2016, when she was convicted of conspiring to leak confidential Vatican paperwork to journalists and received a 10-month suspended sentence.In accordance to the texts, Chaouqui nurtured a grudge towards Becciu, whom she blamed for allegedly supporting her prosecution. She evidently observed the investigation into the London actual estate venture as a prospect to settle scores and implicate Becciu in alleged wrongdoing she experienced uncovered for the duration of her commission times.“I understood that sooner or afterwards the second would appear and I would send you this concept,” Chaouqui wrote Perlasca on May well 12, 2020. “Because the Lord doesn’t make it possible for the very good to be humiliated with out fix. I pardon you Perlasca, but bear in mind, you owe me a favor.”Chaouqui didn’t say what she wanted. But other messages unveiled in courtroom point out she persuaded a Perlasca household buddy and confidante, Genoveffa Ciferri, that she could aid Perlasca stay clear of prosecution if he adopted Chaouqui’s information.In accordance to Ciferri’s texts, the elaborate plan allegedly unfolded as follows: Ciferri believed Chaouqui when she bragged that she was performing hand-in-hand with Vatican prosecutors, gendarmes and the pope in the criminal investigation. Ciferri wanted to assistance Perlasca, and so fed him Chaouqui’s suggestions anonymously.Chaouqui subsequently arranged a evening meal at a Rome cafe throughout which Perlasca tried out to extract incriminating information from Becciu. Perlasca was led to feel the Vatican prosecutors experienced bugged the desk and were being recording their conversation, however no recording has materialized. He presented them with a in-depth memo right after the Sept. 6, 2020 food.The evening meal took location 18 times just before Francis fired Becciu and stripped him of his legal rights as a cardinal primarily based on details he reported he had gained about Becciu’s alleged economical misconduct.Ciferri confessed the entire saga to prosecutor Alessandro Diddi in a Nov. 26 text in which she explained she had schemed with Chaouqui in hopes of sparing Perlasca from starting to be a criminal defendant. Ciferri forwarded Diddi 126 textual content messages she exchanged with Chaouqui and reported Chaouqui experienced served craft the August 2020 memo in which Perlasca turned on the cardinal.The implications of Chaouqui’s alleged interference ended up obvious to individuals in the courtroom: Perlasca, a critical prosecution witness, may perhaps have been persuaded to supply possibly fake testimony about Becciu and some others by an individual with a not-so-concealed agenda. In addition, Chaouqui bragged about doing the job carefully with investigators on the situation.Becciu’s law firm, Fabio Viglione, denounced the “surreal” machinations that served guide to his client’s indictment, declaring Perlasca had been manipulated “to the detriment of the real truth, the authenticity of the investigation and the honorability of His Eminence.”Cataldo Intrieri, the law firm symbolizing Perlasca’s deputy Fabrizio Tirabassi, explained the revelations warrant the trial’s suspension and the opening of a new felony investigation for suspected fraud, threats and obstruction. “Regardless, there are implications for the information that are the subject of this trial,” Intrieri explained.Decide Pignatone turned down protection phone calls to suspend the demo, indicating the proceedings had been dependent additional on documentation about the London offer than Perlasca’s testimony. But he scheduled in-court docket interrogations for Ciferri and Chaouqui.Chaouqui, when arrived at by The Connected Push, declined to comment prior to her court testimony.Diddi defended the investigation, strongly denied getting any dealings with Chaouqui prior to she was questioned in July and introduced he experienced opened a new investigation into possible untrue testimony and other potential crimes primarily based on the texts he acquired from Ciferri. He available to turn around his mobile cell phone to display he experienced no dealings with Chaouqui.“If another person brags about acquiring information (of the investigation) I have to examine,” he reported.Some protection attorneys also privately complained that Diddi experienced evidence in February 2021 of Chaouqui’s alleged involvement with Perlasca but failed to tell the defense, portion of broader defense issues about the peculiarities of the Vatican’s legal system. Diddi acknowledged previous 7 days that Ciferri cellphone him on Feb. 4, 2021 and described Chaouqui’s title.Diddi also listened to from Perlasca on March 1, 2022, when the monsignor submitted a formal criticism alleging Chaouqui experienced threatened him and claimed to be operating with prosecutors. The published grievance was only entered into evidence final 7 days. Protection lawyers stated it was their to start with inkling that Perlasca might be a compromised prosecution witness.“She despatched me threatening messages by way of telephone, indicating I was in her arms and that only she could conserve me from selected prison, building crystal clear she could affect the investigators,” Perlasca wrote in his complaint.Chaouqui was in touch with Perlasca as recently as Nov. 26. She texted him immediately after his 1st court appearances and instructed they fulfill before he went back again on the stand.“My desire, and I believe yours, is that my guidance not emerge at demo due to the fact it would be complicated to describe earlier mentioned all the repercussions that it had,” she wrote.